Richard Gage, AE911Truth, New York City 2016

Marking fifteen years since September 11, 2001, Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth will join forces with an impressive lineup in New York City. (See below for ticket info and Live-Streaming)

New York 2016




Event Details:
10:00 AM to 6:30 PM
Saturday, September 10, and Sunday, September 11, 2016
The Great Hall, Cooper Union
7 East 7th Street, New York, NY 10003

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
NY State Legislative Action Project for 9/11 Justice
9/11 Consensus Panel
9/11 Truth Action Project

Justice In Focus: 9/11 | 2016

Two-Day Symposium Will Bring Together Lawyers, Scholars, and Technical Experts on the Pursuit of 9/11 Justice Fifteen Years Later

Tickets Schedule is HERE

Readers who choose not to attend in person may donate a $10.00 gift and receive a “ticket” for Live Streaming of the event.

See the Trailer for this event:

AE911Truth Landing Page at The Mental Militia:


2 thoughts on “Richard Gage, AE911Truth, New York City 2016

  1. “Wherever a man commits a crime, God finds a witness. Every secret crime has its reporter.”
    ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

    9/11 Finding The Truth by Andrew Johnson – Audiobook


    Other examples of Directed Energy (not necessarily used as a weapon) are radio waves, cell phone signals, TV remote control signals, wireless internet signals…etc.

    Those who want to cover up the evidence of what happen often falsely claim that Dr. Wood is talking about a specific weapon and a specific location of it (e.g. laser beam from outer space, or “spacebeams”). This disinformation campaign was initiated by Steven Jones on 11/11/2006 in a presentation he gave in California (available in the internet archives*), telling his audience that “Judy Woods (Wood) says it’s a laser or maser from space” while showing how difficult it is to hold his hand like a beam from space. Not only does Dr. Wood NOT SAY THAT, she actually RULES THAT OUT. The mechanism of destruction of a laser beam would be from heat and produce a bright and blinding light. But we know the buildings were not cooked to death. The term Directed Energy is used because energy is directed to do something different then it normally does and it is directed to do this within a certain geographic zone. [As a mental example, think of directing the binding energy of matter to repel instead of attract. A solid object would turn to atomic-sized dust. Direct this to happen within the WTC complex and not across the street.]

    At the end of Chapter 20 in Dr. Wood’s book, she explains why playing “name the weapon” game is counterproductive. Name dropping trendy terms is not synonymous with understanding. The easiest example is HAARP. The full capabilities are classified. But people often name-drop the trendy term to APPEAR to know something. A tongue-in-cheek definition of HAARP stands for High Amplitude Advancement of Real Propaganda. They are just substituting “HAARP” for “Bin Laden.”

    In Dr. Wood’s book, the closest she comes to “naming a weapon” is merely describing what it creates: magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions (page 365). But as soon as someone starts talking about a name, people will stop looking at the evidence which is another form of a cover up.

    Early on, Dr. Steven Jones created a website he called “The Journal of Nine Eleven Studies” or J.O.N.E.S. It is referred to as a “peer-reviewed journal” but the only peer-reviewing was to screen out true scientific work and post what he wanted his followers to believe. For the first two years, it was primarily used to promote disinformation about Dr. Wood’s work. For example, Jones recruited a patent attorney for the oil and gas industry (James Gourley**) to write hit pieces on Dr. Wood, refuting “ray beams from outer space.” This convinced his readers that “Judy Woods” must be talking about “ray beams from outer space” and that “such nonsense has been refuted.” Refuting false propaganda about Dr. Wood’s work does not refute Dr. Wood’s work — yet it creates the belief in the average person that Dr. Wood’s work has been refuted.

    Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins also claimed that it would take more than five times the world’s energy to destroy the WTC towers. Does that mean their thermite came from off planet or “outer space”? LOL Steven Jones used to ridicule Dr. Wood during his talks saying that “Judy Woods needs to make calculations to see if it is even possible to turn the buildings to dust”. But any reputable scientist knows that calculations are not a part of observing empirical evidence. What are the calculations for, to prove the buildings are still there or if the buildings are gone? Why not just look? No assumptions needed with empirical evidence.

    The bottom line is that no one has refuted anything in Dr. Wood’s book nor can they. They only refute their own false propaganda about her book, not her book. Other detractors claim that “she hasn’t identified the weapon that was used so she’s got nothing.” To the contrary. The evidence is PROOF that there exists a technology that can do what was done. It happened. That is, the fact that the buildings mostly turned to dust in mid-air shows that there exists a weapon that can turn buildings into dust in mid-air. It happened.

    The sub-title of the book, “Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11” indicates that the book contains evidence of what happened on 9/11 and it is indeed evidence that a technology exists that can do what was done. But this technology does not have to be used for evil purposes. It can be used to provide free-energy to the world much to the demise of the oil and gas industry. That is, Dr. Wood is noting that the same technology that was used for evil can also be used for good. It’s a silver lining in the dark cloud… while also trying to stimulate thought about “what are we doing here? learning new ways to kill or to live”?

    If you are worthy and willing to know the truth, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? as I have. ♥




    “When fascism came to America, Liberty was wrapped in the flag now carrying a cross”.

    1. Okay. Sorry to have taken so long to post your comment. I am very short on minutes every day and every night, so it took me some time to view the videos. I did not watch the Toddlers’ Guide videos, as I felt totally insulted right off the bat and refused to waste my time with them. However, I did view the others and I do not have any problem with the fact that the towers disappeared. I like her word, “dustification”. It was about fourteen or thirteen years ago that I saw one segment of a video which revealed to me a massive section of steel simply turning into dust before my eyes. However, I’m no scientist, nor am an engineer, but am only a high-school graduate, so I did not know how to assimilate what I was seeing.
      Dr. Steven Jones is one man I respect, and I do believe that his thermate samples are valid evidence that explosives were employed, but that does not mean that they were the only “energy” employed, and I can easily be open minded enough to realize that thermate reactions coupled with possibly other explosives could have been used in combination with what Dr. Wood is calling “directed free-energy”.

      Now I will tell you this as well. I am personal friends with Richard GAge, who has a landing page at this website. I love his work, support his work, and promote his work. You are welcome to present evidence here at this site, but I will not permit ad hominem attacks or other forms of “in-fighting” within the 911 Truth movement. This website is devoted to “directed free-spiritual-energy”, lol. We will be using Love’s thought system here, and we shall rise above any temptation to attack anyone who fails to agree with us or who sees the evidence differently. Richard Gage has accomplished gigantic strides in pushing for a new investigation, and I will not have his work insulted at this site. Please do not dis-honor my friends. I will try to post your next comment more quickly, if you care to reply. You are welcome to post evidence here. I am the owner of this place, so I thank you for respecting my space.

      Evidence — Yes! Personal attacks — No!

      Thank you for composing your comment here and giving our readers an opportunity to discover the message of Judy Woods.
      Elias Alias, editor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *